Date: 2nd July 2018
Dear Teresa May
The UK EU Referendum Were the Public Misled
On the 23rd June 2016 the UK went
to vote in a national referendum which would determine whether the UK
would Remain a member of the EU or Leave the EU. Our previous
Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron had implemented his promise:
if the Conservative party were elected, to hold a referendum on
membership of the EU. At the time there was an outcry as the
government had produced and printed a pamphlet consisting of sixteen
pages at public expense:
The pamphlet was delivered to all UK
households. I understand that it cost ten million pounds. There
was considerable outrage at the time as large sections of the public
felt that the government had acted unfairly when opposing views had
considerably less to spend on their campaigns.
I voted to Leave the EU. However, on
reflection' I think that under the circumstances the government were
duty bound to advise the electorate as to whether to leave or remain
members of the EU. Without doubt the government's advice was to remain
members of the EU, its even in the title. The pamphlet is very well
written and laid out. If people had difficult understanding the issues,
they had plenty of time to ask friends and neighbours and listen to
discussions on TV, radio, newspapers and the Internet.
It is surely nonsense that anyone could have
been misled into voting to Leave the EU by the pamphlet. It is
simply absurd for anyone to suggest that they were misled to vote
leave, on the contrary misled to remain could be a fairer claim.
May I remind the Prime Minister of her promises shortly after the
referendum result was made known:
"On 27 June 2016, David
Cameron's spokesperson stated that holding another vote on Britain's
membership to the European Union was 'not remotely on the cards.'[310]
Home Secretary Theresa May made the following comment when announcing
her candidacy to replace Cameron as Conservative leader (and hence as
Prime Minister) on 30 June: 'The campaign was fought ... and the public
gave their verdict. There must be no attempts to remain inside the EU
... and no second referendum. ... Brexit
means Brexit.'[311]
The petition was rejected by the government on 9 July. Its response said
that the referendum vote 'must be respected' and that the government
'must now prepare for the process to exit the EU".[312]
Unfortunately, owing to circumstances that
you as prime minister have been unable to overcome, it is now over two
years since the referendum in which over 17 million British people voted
to Leave the membership of the EU. I believe that would have been more
if members of our government and others had not been carrying out scare
mongering and we were not tied to a First Past The Post system of
electing our MPs and an archaic House of Lords interfering.
Time has almost run out prime minister and I
am sure that the public will not wish that negotiations are extended
beyond the two years that are part of the EU's Article 50 Treaty on the
EU.
Yours Sincerely, A.Citizen
The Prime Minister's office has replied to my letter below. I must apologise as I had mislaid the letter
lO
From the Direct Communications Unit
5th July 2018Dear
1
am writing on behalf of the
Prime Minister to thank you for your letter of
2
July 2018.
The Prime Minister appreciates
the time you have taken to get in touch and share your views.
Thank you, once again, for
writing to the Prime Minister.
Yours sincerely
Correspondence
Officer